Gregory Tejada is indicating his opposition to voting yes on the November proposition on holding a state constitutional convention. He has the belief it's embarrassing when a state has gone thru several constitutions over it's history and his belief that we shouldn't revise of foundational document frequently. Also there always the reason why people support a con-con, because they don't like the current political situation in the state.
I've blogged about it frequently here and I'm sure you saw the link to Rich Miller's syndicated column. What do you guys think about a con-con? Are you for it, against it, or not sure?
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE READ FIRST!!!! Comment Moderating and Anonymous Comment Policy
While anonymous comments are not prohibited we do encourage you to help readers identify you so that other commenters may respond to you. Either read the moderating policy for how or leave an identifier (which could be a nickname for example) at the end of the comment.
Also note that this blog is NOT associated with any public or political officials including Alderman Roderick T. Sawyer!